×
Join the LISEP mailing list
‘Functional Unemployment’ Rate Shows No Improvement, Says Ludwig Institute
Living-wage job prospects mixed across demographic categories

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. “functional unemployment” rate saw a slight uptick in October, rising 0.1 percentage points, according to the latest True Rate of Unemployment (TRU) by the Ludwig Institute for Shared Economic Prosperity (LISEP).

The TRU—a measure of the “functionally unemployed,” defined as the jobless plus those seeking, but unable to find, full-time employment paying above poverty wages ($25,000 a year in 2024 dollars) after adjusting for inflation—rose in October from 23.9% to 24%. Similarly, the official unemployment rate issued by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) remained unchanged at 4.1%. While the overall TRU rose, White workers saw an improvement, with their TRU decreasing by 0.4 points to 22.5%.

Hispanic workers also posted some gains in October, with a TRU dropping from 28.2% to 27.9%. But the rate of the total Hispanic population without functional employment, as measured by the True Rate of Unemployment Out of the Population (TRU OOP), is higher than last month (51.7% vs. 51.1%) due to a lower labor force participation rate—which appears to be a result of low-wage earners leaving the workforce. Black workers saw their TRU rise 1.7 percentage points, from 25.2 to 26.9%.

“Recent events, such as the hurricanes in the southeast U.S. and the Boeing strike, certainly had an impact on the labor market in October, albeit temporarily,” said LISEP Chairman Gene Ludwig. “However, the underlying trend remains: nearly one-quarter of American workers find themselves working for poverty-level wages.”

During the same period, the TRU for men increased 0.4 percentage points, from 19.5% to 19.9%, while the rate for women improved, dropping 0.2 percentage points. And while this represents a slight closing of the gender gap, the TRU for women remains considerably higher at 28.8%.

“Even though major headline economic indicators point to a strong economy that is gaining steam, the data show this is not the reality for a majority of Americans,” Ludwig said. “Without thoughtful economic policy addressing the challenges facing middle-and lower-income families, we will continue to see unrest and dissatisfaction with the status quo.”

‘Functional Unemployment’ Rate Shows No Improvement, Says Ludwig Institute
Living-wage job prospects mixed across demographic categories
Historically, systemic barriers have disproportionately hampered Black farmers’ ability to retain land ownership.
Despite this tragic history, there is still time and economic incentive to set some of the inequities right.
In 2021, working mothers with children under 18 earned just 61.7 cents for every dollar a father made. Much wider than the overall gender wage gap, this difference highlights both the motherhood penalty and the fatherhood premium.
Female-dominated, low-paying, part-time occupations are overrepresented among informal workers who also have a formal job.
We need to create an economic environment where companies can hire these workers as employees and pay them a living wage. There are steps policymakers can take to change the gig economy dynamic.
Dependency on tips over base pay is growing because of actions taken by gig companies to institute tipping.
Even for those lucky enough to be making what amounts in many states to the poverty wage of $15 per hour, many will get nothing but a week’s notice before being out on the street.
One study shows that consistent involvement in extracurricular activities increased a child’s likelihood of attending college by a whopping 400% compared to not being involved at all.
Studies have found that both men and women are paid less if they work in “nurturant” occupations.
Since 2015, the correlation between LISEP’s functional employment to population ratio and the inflation rate was more than four times as strong as the BLS’s employment to population ratio, which is depicted in the graph below.
The employment to population ratio settles the discrepancy between what we see around us and what the data says.
The NBER paper defines employment using the traditional BLS U-3 rate. However, the often-used U-3 number fails to capture the quality of jobs.
Among states with stricter COVID-19 policies, reducing unemployment benefits had little to no effect. The average effect of increased employment seems to have occurred only in those states with looser COVID protocols.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. “functional unemployment” rate saw a slight uptick in October, rising 0.1 percentage points, according to the latest True Rate of Unemployment (TRU) by the Ludwig Institute for Shared Economic Prosperity (LISEP).

The TRU—a measure of the “functionally unemployed,” defined as the jobless plus those seeking, but unable to find, full-time employment paying above poverty wages ($25,000 a year in 2024 dollars) after adjusting for inflation—rose in October from 23.9% to 24%. Similarly, the official unemployment rate issued by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) remained unchanged at 4.1%. While the overall TRU rose, White workers saw an improvement, with their TRU decreasing by 0.4 points to 22.5%.

Hispanic workers also posted some gains in October, with a TRU dropping from 28.2% to 27.9%. But the rate of the total Hispanic population without functional employment, as measured by the True Rate of Unemployment Out of the Population (TRU OOP), is higher than last month (51.7% vs. 51.1%) due to a lower labor force participation rate—which appears to be a result of low-wage earners leaving the workforce. Black workers saw their TRU rise 1.7 percentage points, from 25.2 to 26.9%.

“Recent events, such as the hurricanes in the southeast U.S. and the Boeing strike, certainly had an impact on the labor market in October, albeit temporarily,” said LISEP Chairman Gene Ludwig. “However, the underlying trend remains: nearly one-quarter of American workers find themselves working for poverty-level wages.”

During the same period, the TRU for men increased 0.4 percentage points, from 19.5% to 19.9%, while the rate for women improved, dropping 0.2 percentage points. And while this represents a slight closing of the gender gap, the TRU for women remains considerably higher at 28.8%.

“Even though major headline economic indicators point to a strong economy that is gaining steam, the data show this is not the reality for a majority of Americans,” Ludwig said. “Without thoughtful economic policy addressing the challenges facing middle-and lower-income families, we will continue to see unrest and dissatisfaction with the status quo.”

Notes
‍Jim Gardner
No items found.
Item link
Press Release