×
Join the LISEP mailing list
Ludwig Institute: Rising Prices Hitting Middle, Lower-Income Families Hardest
LISEP’s new metric shows 63.5% increase in basic living costs since 2001 vs. headline 46.2%

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The concern about today’s inflation misses the point, according to a new analysis by the Ludwig Institute for Shared Economic Prosperity (LISEP), which indicates that over the last 20 years, rising consumer prices have hit middle- and lower-income households much harder than the Consumer Price Index suggests.

LISEP today issued a white paper announcing its new True Living Cost (TLC) Index, a measure of price changes of the minimum adequate needs required to maintain a basic standard of living. While the CPI bases its reported rate of inflation on a diverse market basket — including items such as rental cars and hotel rooms, which are of little relevance to middle- and lower-income families — TLC focuses on the basics: housing, food, healthcare, childcare, transportation, technology, and personal care items, the expenditures that consume nearly the entire budget of most American households.

The LISEP analysis revealed that while the CPI remains an excellent measure of overall inflation, it falls short when determining the impact of rising prices on middle- and lower-income families. Since 2001, the TLC rose nearly 1.4 times faster than the CPI, 63.5% compared to the CPI’s 46.2%.

“Rising prices have an impact on each and every household in the nation, but what many policymakers may not realize is that those in the middle to lower end of the income scale have been hit really hard by inflation long before today,” said LISEP Chairman Gene Ludwig. “The CPI only tells part of the story, as the government-reported inflation falls short as a measure of just how much these middle- and lower-income households are suffering. The fact is, the price of bread and milk has gone up much faster than luxury cars in the last 20 years.”

Ludwig went on to note that this understatement of cost-of-living increases over the past 20 years can have serious repercussions for America’s working families, with adjustments in work contracts, retirement benefits, and government payments often tied to the CPI.

“The pandemic and supply chain issues have drawn attention to inflation recently,” Ludwig said. “But in reality, the TLC reveals that the cost of living for working-class families has been increasing steadily over at least two decades. Families with two, full-time middle-class jobs have to take on debt just to meet the most basic standard of living.”

When analyzing just these basic items, LISEP found that since 2001:

  • Housing costs have increased 149%, nearly three times the 54% reported by the CPI housing index;
  • Minimum adequate needs for healthcare is up 157%, compared to CPI’s 90%;
  • The TLC shows that the cost for a family to meet minimal technology needs (phone, internet connection) increased 112% overall, while the CPI reports phone services went down 7% and information services went down 66%.

In one LISEP case study, a single parent household with $47,684 in earnings must take on $6,006 in debt just to meet minimum adequate needs.

“Failing to develop policy that recognizes and addresses the needs of America’s working families will ultimately have dire consequences, both socially and economically,” Ludwig said. “The sooner we recognize the depth and breadth of  how unaffordable life has become in America, the sooner we can do something about it.”

The complete TLC report is available at https://www.lisep.org/costs.

Ludwig Institute: Rising Prices Hitting Middle, Lower-Income Families Hardest
LISEP’s new metric shows 63.5% increase in basic living costs since 2001 vs. headline 46.2%
Historically, systemic barriers have disproportionately hampered Black farmers’ ability to retain land ownership.
Despite this tragic history, there is still time and economic incentive to set some of the inequities right.
In 2021, working mothers with children under 18 earned just 61.7 cents for every dollar a father made. Much wider than the overall gender wage gap, this difference highlights both the motherhood penalty and the fatherhood premium.
Female-dominated, low-paying, part-time occupations are overrepresented among informal workers who also have a formal job.
We need to create an economic environment where companies can hire these workers as employees and pay them a living wage. There are steps policymakers can take to change the gig economy dynamic.
Dependency on tips over base pay is growing because of actions taken by gig companies to institute tipping.
Even for those lucky enough to be making what amounts in many states to the poverty wage of $15 per hour, many will get nothing but a week’s notice before being out on the street.
One study shows that consistent involvement in extracurricular activities increased a child’s likelihood of attending college by a whopping 400% compared to not being involved at all.
Studies have found that both men and women are paid less if they work in “nurturant” occupations.
Since 2015, the correlation between LISEP’s functional employment to population ratio and the inflation rate was more than four times as strong as the BLS’s employment to population ratio, which is depicted in the graph below.
The employment to population ratio settles the discrepancy between what we see around us and what the data says.
The NBER paper defines employment using the traditional BLS U-3 rate. However, the often-used U-3 number fails to capture the quality of jobs.
Among states with stricter COVID-19 policies, reducing unemployment benefits had little to no effect. The average effect of increased employment seems to have occurred only in those states with looser COVID protocols.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The concern about today’s inflation misses the point, according to a new analysis by the Ludwig Institute for Shared Economic Prosperity (LISEP), which indicates that over the last 20 years, rising consumer prices have hit middle- and lower-income households much harder than the Consumer Price Index suggests.

LISEP today issued a white paper announcing its new True Living Cost (TLC) Index, a measure of price changes of the minimum adequate needs required to maintain a basic standard of living. While the CPI bases its reported rate of inflation on a diverse market basket — including items such as rental cars and hotel rooms, which are of little relevance to middle- and lower-income families — TLC focuses on the basics: housing, food, healthcare, childcare, transportation, technology, and personal care items, the expenditures that consume nearly the entire budget of most American households.

The LISEP analysis revealed that while the CPI remains an excellent measure of overall inflation, it falls short when determining the impact of rising prices on middle- and lower-income families. Since 2001, the TLC rose nearly 1.4 times faster than the CPI, 63.5% compared to the CPI’s 46.2%.

“Rising prices have an impact on each and every household in the nation, but what many policymakers may not realize is that those in the middle to lower end of the income scale have been hit really hard by inflation long before today,” said LISEP Chairman Gene Ludwig. “The CPI only tells part of the story, as the government-reported inflation falls short as a measure of just how much these middle- and lower-income households are suffering. The fact is, the price of bread and milk has gone up much faster than luxury cars in the last 20 years.”

Ludwig went on to note that this understatement of cost-of-living increases over the past 20 years can have serious repercussions for America’s working families, with adjustments in work contracts, retirement benefits, and government payments often tied to the CPI.

“The pandemic and supply chain issues have drawn attention to inflation recently,” Ludwig said. “But in reality, the TLC reveals that the cost of living for working-class families has been increasing steadily over at least two decades. Families with two, full-time middle-class jobs have to take on debt just to meet the most basic standard of living.”

When analyzing just these basic items, LISEP found that since 2001:

  • Housing costs have increased 149%, nearly three times the 54% reported by the CPI housing index;
  • Minimum adequate needs for healthcare is up 157%, compared to CPI’s 90%;
  • The TLC shows that the cost for a family to meet minimal technology needs (phone, internet connection) increased 112% overall, while the CPI reports phone services went down 7% and information services went down 66%.

In one LISEP case study, a single parent household with $47,684 in earnings must take on $6,006 in debt just to meet minimum adequate needs.

“Failing to develop policy that recognizes and addresses the needs of America’s working families will ultimately have dire consequences, both socially and economically,” Ludwig said. “The sooner we recognize the depth and breadth of  how unaffordable life has become in America, the sooner we can do something about it.”

The complete TLC report is available at https://www.lisep.org/costs.

Notes
‍Jim Gardner
No items found.
Item link
Press Release