Sound economic policy, like a good weather forecast, relies on timely, comprehensive data. But unlike an errant weather forecast—which might lead to minor inconveniences like a wardrobe mismatch or getting caught in the rain without an umbrella—inaccurate economic data could result in policy that means the difference between prosperity and recession.
With this in mind, a group of 141 civil society organizations and businesses, along with two former U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) commissioners, recently signed a letter to the House and Senate Appropriations Committee chairs urging additional funding for the Current Population Survey (CPS), which is sponsored jointly by the BLS and U.S. Census Bureau. This additional $20.6 million in funding would support the modernization of data collection to measure the monthly unemployment rate and other labor market activity—action that is long overdue.
The importance of the accuracy and completeness of these data cannot be overstated. While the BLS excels at collecting reams of data from across the nation, data collection itself can be a challenge—as demonstrated last month, when monthly payroll figures overstated job growth by 818,000 for the 12 months ended in March. Drilling down to the granular level takes time and initially relies on preliminary estimates—which are subject to revision after the collection of the hard data. In this case, the downward revision of nearly 28% (68,000 jobs a month) could have had an impact on the formulation of appropriate economic policy in the interim. This delayed indicator of stagnating job growth may have very well postponed the recent interest rate reduction by the Federal Reserve.
At the Ludwig Institute for Shared Economic Prosperity, we advocate for the inclusion of more-responsive and real-world-reflective metrics as yardsticks for measuring economic performance, such as our True Rate of Unemployment (TRU), a measure of the “functionally unemployed”—defined as the jobless plus those seeking, but unable to find, full-time employment paying above poverty wages ($25,000 a year in 2024 dollars) after adjusting for inflation. During the period subject to the job-creation shortfall (March 2024), the TRU gradually ramped up following March 2023, from 23.4% to 24.2% a year later. This could have served as an early warning sign of a softening labor market.
Undoubtedly the BLS and Census Bureau need the tools and resources to continue the phenomenal work they have performed for decades, and that means the modernization of its data collection—and I would encourage this to include the adoption of alternative metrics, such as the TRU, as a complement to existing measures of the labor market. I join the 141 letter signatories in urging Congress to approve a funding increase for the Current Population Survey.