×
Join the LISEP mailing list
The Invisible Workforce: Women in the Informal Economy

Women’s overrepresentation in the informal economy is not surprising, given their disproportionate presence in low-quality jobs in the formal labor market. While headline unemployment rates may seem favorable for women, with the rate for women close to or lower than the rate for men in recent decades, they fail to capture the true extent of gender disparity in job market outcomes. According to LISEP’s metrics, the female TRU at 26.8% in October 2023 is one of the lowest rates recorded for women since 1995. However, it is still 7.8 percentage points higher than the male TRU at 19.0%. This discrepancy highlights the challenges women face in accessing decent and formal employment.

TRU Reveals Gender Disparities in Functional Unemployment Masked by BLS Stats

January 1995–October 2023

Moreover, LISEP’s True Weekly Earnings (TWE) metric, which considers median wages for the entire workforce instead of just full-time workers, reveals a significant wage gap. The median female worker earns 79 cents for every dollar a male worker makes, wider than the headline earnings gap of 83 cents on the dollar. This disparity exposes the pervasive gender inequality driving many women to seek employment in the informal sector.

True Weekly Earnings by Sex

Q3 2023

Women are more likely to earn near-poverty wages and to settle for part-time jobs when seeking full-time employment. A 2021 study finds women have “50% higher odds relative to men of working part-time involuntarily” and individuals in female-dominated occupations such as childcare workers, nurses or teachers are much more likely to involuntarily work part-time hours than individuals in male-dominated occupations such as engineers or manufacturing workers.2 LISEP’s analysis found those working part-time for economic reasons, including because of problems finding childcare, made up 16.5% of informal workers, compared to 9.9% of the overall population, a 67% difference.

Female-dominated, low-paying, part-time occupations are overrepresented among informal workers who also have a formal job. For example, low wages and underemployment drive essential care workers, such as nurses and childcare workers, to the informal economy. Despite having college degrees and earning more than the national median, education workers such as teachers or librarians, 73% of whom are women, disproportionately turn to the informal economy.3 They are more likely to work part-time involuntarily and receive a wage penalty compared to other college-educated workers, earning 26.4% less in 2022.4  Personal Care and Service and Healthcare Support occupations such as hairdressers and home health aides, making up 3.5% and 2.3% of all employment during the period, respectively, are both female-dominated occupations that pay at least 30% less than the national median wage. However, they comprise 10.9% and 3.2% of informal workers, respectively.

Female-dominated Occupations with Low Wages or High Rates of Involuntary Part-time Are Overrepresented Among Informal Workers

2022

Women’s disproportionate participation in the informal economy can also be explained by the greater burden of unpaid household responsibilities they often bear. Analysis from Pew Research Center shows mothers aged 25 to 44 have lower labor force participation rates and work fewer hours than childless women of the same age, while fathers tend to work more and for longer periods than their childless peers.5 In 2021, working mothers with children under 18 earned just 61.7 cents for every dollar a father made. Much wider than the overall gender wage gap, this difference highlights both the motherhood penalty and the fatherhood premium occurring in the labor market.6

Given the lack of affordable childcare options in the United States, many women forego formal employment where they cannot generate enough income to cover childcare expenses.7 The sporadic and entrepreneurial nature of informal work allows caregivers to earn additional income while still fulfilling their family obligations. This can take various forms, such as taking on gig work for a few hours per week, selling goods as street vendors while accompanied by their children, or providing “off-the-books” group childcare services.

The International Labour Organization documents that mothers globally participate more than fathers in the informal economy due to childcare responsibilities, especially in countries without support for workers’ family responsibilities.8 In the United States, mothers are much more likely than fathers to work in jobs that resemble informal employment, with irregular schedules, low pay, and lack of protections.9 This type of nonstandard work can help them better balance family responsibilities than traditional jobs with inflexible schedules but better pay.10

Examining the informal economy sheds light on the systemic gender inequalities that persist in all types of modern work. The TRU focuses the picture, helping us understand the challenges faced by these workers better. Assessing the quality of formal job opportunities reveals that low wages and underemployment drive these workers to the informal sector. Specifically, the wage and occupation disadvantages women experience in the formal job market contribute to their overrepresentation as informal workers. And given low earnings, informal work is far from offsetting the significant gender disparities in the labor market.

The Invisible Workforce: Women in the Informal Economy

In today’s economy, one sector often goes unnoticed — the informal economy. It is a hidden realm of economic activity characterized by a lack of regulation and taxation, with activities ranging from street vending and domestic work to agricultural labor. The sector is plagued by poverty, exploitation, and lack of social protections — and is one in which women play a significant role, making up a disproportionately large share of informal employment.

The Ludwig Institute for Shared Economic Prosperity (LISEP) measured informal work through the lens of the True Rate of Unemployment (TRU) — a measure of the “functionally unemployed”1  — to determine the extent to which lower-income individuals rely on unreported income, like gig work or one-off jobs, to bridge the gap to functional employment. While anyone engaging in informal work — income-generating activities conducted outside traditional employment and wage-tracking systems — counts as informally employed, they remain functionally unemployed if they cannot earn a living wage and full-time status when considering both their formal and informal labor combined.

Since 2003, on any given workweek, only 3.3% of adults worked informally, with women making up 60% of informal workers. Many turn to the informal economy as a means to supplement extremely low incomes— only a small percentage (19%) of female informal workers meet the criteria for functional employment before accounting for unreported income. Even with this additional income, just over 40% earn above-poverty wages and work full-time hours. While the unreported income provides some relief, the majority of female informal workers remain functionally unemployed.

Historically, systemic barriers have disproportionately hampered Black farmers’ ability to retain land ownership.
Despite this tragic history, there is still time and economic incentive to set some of the inequities right.
In 2021, working mothers with children under 18 earned just 61.7 cents for every dollar a father made. Much wider than the overall gender wage gap, this difference highlights both the motherhood penalty and the fatherhood premium.
Female-dominated, low-paying, part-time occupations are overrepresented among informal workers who also have a formal job.
We need to create an economic environment where companies can hire these workers as employees and pay them a living wage. There are steps policymakers can take to change the gig economy dynamic.
Dependency on tips over base pay is growing because of actions taken by gig companies to institute tipping.
Even for those lucky enough to be making what amounts in many states to the poverty wage of $15 per hour, many will get nothing but a week’s notice before being out on the street.
One study shows that consistent involvement in extracurricular activities increased a child’s likelihood of attending college by a whopping 400% compared to not being involved at all.
Studies have found that both men and women are paid less if they work in “nurturant” occupations.
Since 2015, the correlation between LISEP’s functional employment to population ratio and the inflation rate was more than four times as strong as the BLS’s employment to population ratio, which is depicted in the graph below.
The employment to population ratio settles the discrepancy between what we see around us and what the data says.
The NBER paper defines employment using the traditional BLS U-3 rate. However, the often-used U-3 number fails to capture the quality of jobs.
Among states with stricter COVID-19 policies, reducing unemployment benefits had little to no effect. The average effect of increased employment seems to have occurred only in those states with looser COVID protocols.

Women’s overrepresentation in the informal economy is not surprising, given their disproportionate presence in low-quality jobs in the formal labor market. While headline unemployment rates may seem favorable for women, with the rate for women close to or lower than the rate for men in recent decades, they fail to capture the true extent of gender disparity in job market outcomes. According to LISEP’s metrics, the female TRU at 26.8% in October 2023 is one of the lowest rates recorded for women since 1995. However, it is still 7.8 percentage points higher than the male TRU at 19.0%. This discrepancy highlights the challenges women face in accessing decent and formal employment.

TRU Reveals Gender Disparities in Functional Unemployment Masked by BLS Stats

January 1995–October 2023

Moreover, LISEP’s True Weekly Earnings (TWE) metric, which considers median wages for the entire workforce instead of just full-time workers, reveals a significant wage gap. The median female worker earns 79 cents for every dollar a male worker makes, wider than the headline earnings gap of 83 cents on the dollar. This disparity exposes the pervasive gender inequality driving many women to seek employment in the informal sector.

True Weekly Earnings by Sex

Q3 2023

Women are more likely to earn near-poverty wages and to settle for part-time jobs when seeking full-time employment. A 2021 study finds women have “50% higher odds relative to men of working part-time involuntarily” and individuals in female-dominated occupations such as childcare workers, nurses or teachers are much more likely to involuntarily work part-time hours than individuals in male-dominated occupations such as engineers or manufacturing workers.2 LISEP’s analysis found those working part-time for economic reasons, including because of problems finding childcare, made up 16.5% of informal workers, compared to 9.9% of the overall population, a 67% difference.

Female-dominated, low-paying, part-time occupations are overrepresented among informal workers who also have a formal job. For example, low wages and underemployment drive essential care workers, such as nurses and childcare workers, to the informal economy. Despite having college degrees and earning more than the national median, education workers such as teachers or librarians, 73% of whom are women, disproportionately turn to the informal economy.3 They are more likely to work part-time involuntarily and receive a wage penalty compared to other college-educated workers, earning 26.4% less in 2022.4  Personal Care and Service and Healthcare Support occupations such as hairdressers and home health aides, making up 3.5% and 2.3% of all employment during the period, respectively, are both female-dominated occupations that pay at least 30% less than the national median wage. However, they comprise 10.9% and 3.2% of informal workers, respectively.

Female-dominated Occupations with Low Wages or High Rates of Involuntary Part-time Are Overrepresented Among Informal Workers

2022

Women’s disproportionate participation in the informal economy can also be explained by the greater burden of unpaid household responsibilities they often bear. Analysis from Pew Research Center shows mothers aged 25 to 44 have lower labor force participation rates and work fewer hours than childless women of the same age, while fathers tend to work more and for longer periods than their childless peers.5 In 2021, working mothers with children under 18 earned just 61.7 cents for every dollar a father made. Much wider than the overall gender wage gap, this difference highlights both the motherhood penalty and the fatherhood premium occurring in the labor market.6

Given the lack of affordable childcare options in the United States, many women forego formal employment where they cannot generate enough income to cover childcare expenses.7 The sporadic and entrepreneurial nature of informal work allows caregivers to earn additional income while still fulfilling their family obligations. This can take various forms, such as taking on gig work for a few hours per week, selling goods as street vendors while accompanied by their children, or providing “off-the-books” group childcare services.

The International Labour Organization documents that mothers globally participate more than fathers in the informal economy due to childcare responsibilities, especially in countries without support for workers’ family responsibilities.8 In the United States, mothers are much more likely than fathers to work in jobs that resemble informal employment, with irregular schedules, low pay, and lack of protections.9 This type of nonstandard work can help them better balance family responsibilities than traditional jobs with inflexible schedules but better pay.10

Examining the informal economy sheds light on the systemic gender inequalities that persist in all types of modern work. The TRU focuses the picture, helping us understand the challenges faced by these workers better. Assessing the quality of formal job opportunities reveals that low wages and underemployment drive these workers to the informal sector. Specifically, the wage and occupation disadvantages women experience in the formal job market contribute to their overrepresentation as informal workers. And given low earnings, informal work is far from offsetting the significant gender disparities in the labor market.

Notes
  1. LISEP defines functional unemployment as earning less than a living-wage, conservatively set at $20,000 a year in 2020 dollars, or being unemployed or underemployed, meaning wanting a full-time job but being unable to find one.
  2. Pech, C., Klainot-Hess, E., & Norris, D. (2021). Part-time by gender, not choice: The gender gap in involuntary part-time work. Sociological Perspectives, 64(2), 280-300.
  3. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (n.d.). Employed persons by detailed occupation, sex, race, and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. Retrieved November 9, 2023, from https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.htm
  4. Allegretto, S. Teacher pay penalty still looms large: Trends in teacher wages and compensation through 2022. Accessed on https://www.epi.org/publication/teacher-pay-in-2022/#full-report
  5. Kochhar, R. (2023). The enduring grip of the gender pay gap. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2023/03/01/the-enduring-grip-of-the-gender-pay-gap
  6. Lutz, W. (2023). State by state, mothers are maid much less than fathers [Fact sheet]. Institute for Women’s Policy Research. Accessed on https://iwpr.org/in-2021-working-moms-made-just-62-cents-on-the-dollar-compared-to-working-fathers-in-every-u-s-state-according-to-new-iwpr-fact-sheet
  7. Schochet, L. (2019). The child care crisis is keeping women out of the workforce. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress https://www.americanprogress.org/article/child-care-crisis-keeping-women-workforce
  8. Cassirer, N., & Addati, L. (2007). Expanding women's employment opportunities: Informal economy workers and the need for childcare. Geneva, Switzerland: ILO. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_emp/@emp_policy/documents/meetingdocument/wcms_125991.pdf
  9. Albelda, R., Bell-Pasht, A., & Konstantinidis, C. (2020). Gender and precarious work in the United States: Evidence from the contingent work supplement 1995–2017. Review of Radical Political Economics, 52(3), 542-563. https://doi.org/10.1177/0486613419891175
  10. Kim, M. (2022). Who works nonstandard schedules voluntarily?: The role of having children. Journal of Family Studies, 28(3), 950-967.
Santiago Dassen

Santiago is a research analyst at LISEP where he conducts data analysis to generate labor and cost-of-living statistics that better illustrate the economic reality of low- and middle-income Americans.

Santiago previously interned at Development Finance International, Inc (DFI), a global consultancy dedicated to advancing business and country development objectives in emerging economies. He also worked as a business development intern at Booster2Success, a French digital communications agency.

Santiago earned a B.S. in economics from The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania with a concentration in business economics and public policy as well as in behavioral economics.

No items found.
Item link
Analysis